61. Wicked Problem Scorecard

1 July 2024
How can I assess how challenging the problem is that I am facing?

Key Definitions

Managers are problem-solvers – they are oriented towards tackling issues that impede an organization from reaching its goals. They constantly try to understand what types of problems are holding the organization back, or might threaten the organization in future, and then look for a solution to enable the organization to move forward.

Yet, problems differ in their level of difficulty. Rittel and Webber (1973) famously made a distinction between tame and wicked problems. Tame problems are by their nature easy to solve, even though they might require a lot of work. Wicked problems, however, are challenging messes that are difficult, if not impossible, to resolve.

Conceptual Model

The Wicked Problem Scorecard is an evaluation framework for assessing a problem’s relative difficulty. An index value can be calculated for any type of problem by using 15 characteristics to judge its level of wickedness. By giving a score of 1 (fully tame) to five (fully wicked) for each of the 15 measures, then adding all the scores together and dividing by 15, an index value is calculated indicating the relative difficulty of the problem. This scorecard is not intended to convey an objective truth, but to give a rough estimation to sensitize the problem-solver(s).

Key Elements

The scorecard consists of three categories of five characteristics each:

  1. The first part focuses on the nature of the problem itself, without consideration of the stakeholders. A wicked problem is not evil, but just outright confusing and frustrating by its very structure. This is also often referred to as a problem’s level of complexity or complication. A problem is wicked if it has the following characteristics:
    1. Definition. The interpretation of the problem varies widely depending on who you ask;
    2. Separation. The problem is linked to an intricate web of other problems;
    3. Timing. The problem requires immediate attention and needs to be resolved quickly;
    4. Data. Most information needed to understand and solve the problem is unavailable;
    5. Predictability. How the problem will evolve in future can’t be objectively foreseen.
  2. The second part of the scorecard focuses on the people who play a role in the problem. Some stakeholders are involved because they believe that their interests (or those of third parties) are at stake, while others can be involved as potential problem-solvers. A problem is wicked if the stakeholders have the following characteristics:
    1. Identity. The stakeholders are unknown or there are different views on who they are;
    2. Drivers. The stakeholders’ worldview and understanding of what is important differs;
    3. Motivation. Some or all of the stakeholders don’t really want to solve the problem;
    4. Separation. Some or all of the problem solvers are themselves part of the problem;
    5. Capability. The problem solvers have limited power to influence the problem.
  3. Solution. The third part of the scorecard focuses of the nature of the potential solutions. A solution is any type of practical intervention directed at alleviating the problem. Some integrative solutions can resolve the entire problem, while some narrower measures can nudge the problem a bit closer to a solution. A problem is wicked if the solution is like this:
    1. Availability. There is no fixed set from which to choose, so solutions must be invented;
    2. Predictability. How possible interventions will influence solving the problem is uncertain;
    3. Selection. No solution is the best, as each has its own strengths and weaknesses;
    4. Execution. All potential solutions are very difficult to put into practice;
    5. Impact. Any intervention will immediately change the nature of the problem.

Key Insights

  • Wicked problems are everywhere. At school we learn to solve tame puzzles, but we seldom learn to grapple with wicked messes. Yet, wicked problems abound, when setting strategy, developing new policies, innovating, and implementing organizational change. The more senior the manager, the more their work consists of managing wicked problems.
  • Wicked problems need to be recognized. It is important to know the level of wickedness of a problem, to avoid overoptimism, naïve quick fixes, and mounting frustration. In many cases, the realistic manager will understand the problem can’t be solved but only managed.
  • Wicked problems need to be assessed. The level of wickedness can’t be scientifically determined, but can be pragmatically estimated, by evaluating three types of characteristics – what is the nature of the problem, what is the profile of the stakeholders and what is the nature of the possible solutions.
  • Wicked problems need to be measured. The Wicked Problem Scorecard is a pragmatic way to quickly measure the level of wickedness of a problem. This helps to clarify the difficulty of the challenge and create a shared understanding among all involved.
  • Wicked problems need to be tamed. It is foolish to treat a wicked problem as if it was tame, but it is pessimistic to assume that a wicked problem can’t be tamed a bit. A first step towards taming a wicked problem is by recognizing and measuring its level of wickedness. Calculating an index number is useful, but doing the assessment together is even better.
Subscribe to our monthly Management Model

Do you want to be notified of our monthly Management Model? Please fill in your email address here.

Publication Schedule

June 2024
Time Management Funnel

May 2024
Digitalization Staircase

April 2024
Leadership Circle Map

March 2024
MOVING Mission Framework

February 2024
BOLD Vision Framework

January 2024
Duty of Care Feedback Model

December 2023
Best Practice Sharing Modes

November 2023
Stakeholder Stance Map

October 2023
Status Snakes & Ladders

September 2023
Customer-Centricity Circle

August 2023
Activity System Dial

July 2023
New Pyramid Principle

June 2023  
Cultural Fabric Model

May 2023       
Corporate Strategy Framework

April 2023  
Ambition Radar Screen

March 2023
Resistance to Change Typology

February 2023   
5I Innovation Pipeline

January 2023     
Thinking Directions Framework

December 2022      
Corporate Management Styles

November 2022     
Strategic Action Model 

October 2022
Psychological Safety Compass

September 2022
The Tree of Power    

August 2022
Value Proposition Dial

July 2022
Sustainable You Model

June 2022
Change Manager’s Toolbox

May 2022
Corporate Value Creation Model

April 2022
Organizational System Map

March 2022
Creativity X-Factor

February 2022
Strategic Alignment Model

January 2022
Market System Map

December 2021
Team Building Cycle

November 2021
Disciplined Dialogue Model

Oktober 2021
Strategy Hourglass

September 2021
Powerhouse Framework

August 2021
Fruits & Nuts Matrix

July 2021
Everest Model of Change

June 2021
Followership Cycle

May 2021
Knowledge Sharing Bridges

April 2021
Innovation Box

March 2021
Empowerment Cycle

February 2021
Digital Distribution Model Dial

January 2021
Digital Product Model Dial

December 2020
4C Leadership Levers

November 2020
Rebound Model of Resilience

October 2020
Strategic Bets Framework

September 2020
Storytelling Scripts

August 2020
7I Roles of the Corporate Center

July 2020
Strategy Development Cycle

June 2020
Rising Star Framework

May 2020
The Control Panel

April 2020
Strategic Agility Model

March 2020
Leadership Fairness Framework

February 2020
11C Synergy Model

January 2020
Competition Tornado

December 2019
Confidence Quotient

November 2019
House of Engagement

October 2019
Revenue Model Framework

September 2019
Interaction Pressure Gauge

August 2019
Digital Platform Map

July 2019
Mind the Gap Model


Double-click to edit button text. crossarrow-leftcross-circle