40. Psychological Safety Compass

3 October 2022
What types of psychological safety do I want to create for people in my organization?

 Key Definitions

People experience psychological safety when they do not fear negative social reactions, such as disapproval, rejection, blame or retribution. In a psychologically safe team or organization people feel they are not running the risk of being harshly judged by others and therefore will dare to be more outgoing and proactive, instead of withdrawn and careful.

Key to psychological safety is a sense of inclusion and fairness – inclusion means a person is fully admitted to a social group as a respected member, while fairness means that a person is treated in a reasonable and equitable manner. Generally, the more diversity in a team or organization, the more challenging it is to ensure inclusion and fairness.

Conceptual Model

The Psychological Safety Compass outlines the four main social fears that undermine people’s psychological safety, as well as the four linked types of safety that need to be created to allow people to function optimally as team members. The four types of psychological safety differ along two axes – vertically whether they focus on people’s sense of inclusion or fairness, and horizontally whether they focus on what the individual is/does or on how the individual relates to others. As a compass, the model encourages leaders to measure safety and take actions in all four directions, instead of seeing psychological safety as one monolithic phenomenon.

Key Elements

The four related types of psychological safety are the following:

  1. Acceptance Safety: Avoiding the Fear of Disapproval. To dare to show yourself as you genuinely are, you need to feel that other team members will accept you without judgement. You need to sense an openness to take you as you are, instead of measuring you against some unwritten criteria of how you should be. If the fear that you don’t meet the norms subsides, you no longer have to wear a mask, or worry about losing face, but can be your authentic self, warts and all. You can be vulnerable, honestly admitting your weaknesses, and you can be different, without being branded as an oddball.
  2. Connection Safety: Avoiding the Fear of Rejection. Being accepted, or maybe just tolerated, doesn’t necessarily mean that other people will happily be in your presence and enthusiastically talk with you. To dare to interact with other team members, you need to feel that they see you, value you and welcome you to connect. You need to sense an openness to get to know you, involve you in conversations and hear what you have to say. Once the fear of rejection and being locked out subsides, you can more easily approach teammates, speak up and even ask others to help you.
  3. Activity Safety: Avoiding the Fear of Blame. Anytime you do something, there is a risk of it being wrong or going wrong. But at the same time there is a social risk of being blamed for what is perceived as wrong by other team members. This blame can lead to shame, loss of standing and even punishment. To dare to do things, particularly more risky things such as solving complex problems or engaging in innovative ventures, you need to feel a tolerance for mistakes and even an admiration for taking action. Only once the unfair threat of blame is off the table, will you readily act, as well as admit when things go wrong.
  4. Challenge Safety: Avoiding the Fear of Retribution. ‘An elephant in the room’ is when there is an uncomfortable issue you shouldn’t bring up. If you do break the silence, retribution by teammates is often swift. In the same way, you risk being punished by contravening other group rules, or asking uncomfortable questions, surfacing awkward problems, and stating unorthodox opinions. So, to dare to speak up, you need to feel there is room to challenge the status quo without fear of retaliation, or that there is even respect for the person who opens up the dialogue and pushes people out of their comfort zone.

Key Insights

  • Psychological safety is about avoiding four types of social fear. In any group, people run the risk of being harshly judged by others and suffering the consequences. There is a threat of disapproval (not being accepted for who you are), rejection (not being welcomed as a group member), blame (found at fault for something that happened) and retribution (being retaliated against for challenging the status quo). People experience psychological safety when these four fears are absent.
  • Psychological safety requires inclusion. To feel psychologically safe, a person needs to feel they can show who they genuinely are (acceptance safety) and that they will be welcomed to participate in the group (connection safety). Together this creates inclusion.
  • Psychological safety requires equity. To feel psychologically safe, a person needs to feel their actions will be judged fairly (activity safety) and their uncomfortable questions will be viewed as useful (challenge safety). Together this creates a sense of fairness.
  • Leaders need to manage all four types of psychological safety. Psychological safety is a fuzzy topic for many leaders, making it attractive to simplify by only focusing on one type. Yet, the four types are different, and all require specific attention.
  • Even with safety, courage remains important. Full psychological safety is impossible, as some social risk will always remain. Therefore, leaders need to also stimulate people to show social courage to be and act despite their fears. Leaders should help to create safety, but without becoming curling leaders, sweeping away all team members’ challenges.


Subscribe to our monthly Management Model

Do you want to be notified of our monthly Management Model? Please fill in your email address here.

Publication Schedule

June 2024
Time Management Funnel

May 2024
Digitalization Staircase

April 2024
Leadership Circle Map

March 2024
MOVING Mission Framework

February 2024
BOLD Vision Framework

January 2024
Duty of Care Feedback Model

December 2023
Best Practice Sharing Modes

November 2023
Stakeholder Stance Map

October 2023
Status Snakes & Ladders

September 2023
Customer-Centricity Circle

August 2023
Activity System Dial

July 2023
New Pyramid Principle

June 2023  
Cultural Fabric Model

May 2023       
Corporate Strategy Framework

April 2023  
Ambition Radar Screen

March 2023
Resistance to Change Typology

February 2023   
5I Innovation Pipeline

January 2023     
Thinking Directions Framework

December 2022      
Corporate Management Styles

November 2022     
Strategic Action Model 

October 2022
Psychological Safety Compass

September 2022
The Tree of Power    

August 2022
Value Proposition Dial

July 2022
Sustainable You Model

June 2022
Change Manager’s Toolbox

May 2022
Corporate Value Creation Model

April 2022
Organizational System Map

March 2022
Creativity X-Factor

February 2022
Strategic Alignment Model

January 2022
Market System Map

December 2021
Team Building Cycle

November 2021
Disciplined Dialogue Model

Oktober 2021
Strategy Hourglass

September 2021
Powerhouse Framework

August 2021
Fruits & Nuts Matrix

July 2021
Everest Model of Change

June 2021
Followership Cycle

May 2021
Knowledge Sharing Bridges

April 2021
Innovation Box

March 2021
Empowerment Cycle

February 2021
Digital Distribution Model Dial

January 2021
Digital Product Model Dial

December 2020
4C Leadership Levers

November 2020
Rebound Model of Resilience

October 2020
Strategic Bets Framework

September 2020
Storytelling Scripts

August 2020
7I Roles of the Corporate Center

July 2020
Strategy Development Cycle

June 2020
Rising Star Framework

May 2020
The Control Panel

April 2020
Strategic Agility Model

March 2020
Leadership Fairness Framework

February 2020
11C Synergy Model

January 2020
Competition Tornado

December 2019
Confidence Quotient

November 2019
House of Engagement

October 2019
Revenue Model Framework

September 2019
Interaction Pressure Gauge

August 2019
Digital Platform Map

July 2019
Mind the Gap Model


Double-click to edit button text. crossarrow-leftcross-circle