35. Corporate Value Creation Model

1 May 2022
How can my firm create extra value by being in two or more businesses?

Key Definitions

A corporation is a firm consisting of two or more business units. Each business unit creates economic value-added for the corporation by producing and selling products and/or services in a particular market at a price higher than the cost per unit. If corporations only engaged in this standalone value creation, their overall value-added would be the sum of their parts.

Yet corporations also add extra costs to their business units by having at least one extra level of management. Therefore, they need extra corporate value creation over and above their standalone value creation activities to more than offset these additional corporate costs.

Conceptual Model

The Corporate Value Creation Model describes the four ways in which a corporation can create extra value, on top of what a business unit could have achieved on its own. Horizontally, the four value types differ in the length of time typically required to realize the intended value-added after launching or acquiring a new business. Vertically, they differ in how much they interfere with the business unit’s ability to quickly react in a tailored way to the specific demands in their market. This diminished responsiveness is in itself an additional corporate cost.

Key Elements

The four types of corporate value creation are the following:

  1. Portfolio Value. When a corporation acts like an investor, using financial engineering to add value to its portfolio of holdings, we speak of portfolio value. The metaphor here is ‘leveraging the family fortune’ – using the corporation’s money to make more money. Three common ways of creating portfolio value are:
    1. Acquisitions/divestments. Buying businesses cheaply and selling them dearly.
    2. Capital reallocation. Shifting cheaper internal capital between business units.
    3. Tax optimization. Shifting tax burdens/advantages between business units.

All these forms of portfolio value creation can be achieved relatively quickly, with little interference in the day-to-day management of the business units.

  1. Reputational Value. Often the fact that a business unit belongs to a particular corporation will bestow it with an air of reliability and/or attractiveness, which could help to win over external stakeholders. The metaphor here is ‘leveraging the family name’ – using the corporation’s reputation to gain competitive advantage. Three common forms are:
    1. Buyer trust. Gaining customers’ confidence and hence a stronger bargaining position.
    2. Partner trust. Gaining more confidence with suppliers, contractors and complementors.
    3. Labor market desirability. Looking more appealing to prospective employees.

All these forms of reputational value require a bit of time for ‘advertising’ but can be realized relatively quickly. Business units only need to avoid damaging the corporate good name.

  1. Management Value. Many business units, as ‘daughter companies’, can benefit by having a good ‘mother’, who can help with guidance, assistance, rules, and sometimes a stern hand. The metaphor here is ‘leveraging the family parents’ – letting the corporate center support and steer the ‘children’ depending on their level of development. This includes:
    1. Management control. Interacting with business unit managers to direct their behavior.
    2. Business unit staffing. Ensuring the right people are in the right positions.
    3. Organizational systems. Installing the most appropriate processes and practices.

All this is also called parenting value or vertical value creation and takes a while to achieve. The extra coordination also limits the ability of the business units to be responsive.

  1. Synergy Value. Many business units, as ‘daughter companies’, can also benefit by having good brothers and sisters, with whom they can share and get stronger. The metaphor here is ‘leveraging the family siblings’ – getting the children to work together as a team to save money or get better. The three most important types of synergies are:
    1. Sharing resources. Copying, reallocating or jointly using tangible and intangible means.
    2. Integrating activities. Carrying out activities together or in coordination.
    3. Aligning positions. Jointly approaching customers, suppliers, or other stakeholders.

All this is also called sibling value or horizontal value creation and can take a long time to grow. The high level of necessary coordination strongly restricts business responsiveness.

  • Corporate value creation is essential. Most large firms consist of more than two business units, requiring more levels of management, bringing more cost and potential bureaucracy. They need to have a clear understanding of which value-added they are pursuing.
  • Corporate value creation is possible in four ways. As a family of business units, corporations can leverage the family fortune (portfolio value), the family name (reputational value), the family parents (management value) and/or the family siblings (synergy value).
  • Corporate value creation takes time. All four types of corporate value creation require an investment of time and energy before the full advantages can be realized. Many private equity investors therefore focus on portfolio, reputation, and a bit of management value.
  • Corporate value creation comes at a cost. Management and synergy value look potentially attractive, but besides taking long to achieve, they also limit a business unit’s responsiveness, making them slower and less focused, while undermining ownership.
  • Corporate value creation is overlooked. Despite its importance, few corporations have an explicit corporate level strategy in which they clarify which types of value are being pursued and how the negative impact on responsiveness will be limited.
Subscribe to our monthly Management Model

Do you want to be notified of our monthly Management Model? Please fill in your email address here.

Publication Schedule

April 2024
Leadership Circle Map

March 2024
MOVING Mission Framework

February 2024
BOLD Vision Framework

January 2024
Duty of Care Feedback Model

December 2023
Best Practice Sharing Modes

November 2023
Stakeholder Stance Map

October 2023
Status Snakes & Ladders

September 2023
Customer-Centricity Circle

August 2023
Activity System Dial

July 2023
New Pyramid Principle

June 2023  
Cultural Fabric Model

May 2023       
Corporate Strategy Framework

April 2023  
Ambition Radar Screen

March 2023
Resistance to Change Typology

February 2023   
5I Innovation Pipeline

January 2023     
Thinking Directions Framework

December 2022      
Corporate Management Styles

November 2022     
Strategic Action Model 

October 2022
Psychological Safety Compass

September 2022
The Tree of Power    

August 2022
Value Proposition Dial

July 2022
Sustainable You Model

June 2022
Change Manager’s Toolbox

May 2022
Corporate Value Creation Model

April 2022
Organizational System Map

March 2022
Creativity X-Factor

February 2022
Strategic Alignment Model

January 2022
Market System Map

December 2021
Team Building Cycle

November 2021
Disciplined Dialogue Model

Oktober 2021
Strategy Hourglass

September 2021
Powerhouse Framework

August 2021
Fruits & Nuts Matrix

July 2021
Everest Model of Change

June 2021
Followership Cycle

May 2021
Knowledge Sharing Bridges

April 2021
Innovation Box

March 2021
Empowerment Cycle

February 2021
Digital Distribution Model Dial

January 2021
Digital Product Model Dial

December 2020
4C Leadership Levers

November 2020
Rebound Model of Resilience

October 2020
Strategic Bets Framework

September 2020
Storytelling Scripts

August 2020
7I Roles of the Corporate Center

July 2020
Strategy Development Cycle

June 2020
Rising Star Framework

May 2020
The Control Panel

April 2020
Strategic Agility Model

March 2020
Leadership Fairness Framework

February 2020
11C Synergy Model

January 2020
Competition Tornado

December 2019
Confidence Quotient

November 2019
House of Engagement

October 2019
Revenue Model Framework

September 2019
Interaction Pressure Gauge

August 2019
Digital Platform Map

July 2019
Mind the Gap Model


Double-click to edit button text. crossarrow-leftcross-circle